Juniper Publishers Annals of Social Sciences and Management studies

  Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies-Juniper Publishers Opinion Whether the world works regularly or not, and whether the nature of the world is knowable or unknowable, Einstein and Bohr have debated these two questions for more than 40 years, no one was persuaded by the other until their death. After that, physicists divided into two camps to continue the debate. The detailed story can be found in many articles and books, e.g. [1,2]. I find Bohr’s agnosticism a paradox in its own way. If he was believed that the operation of the micro world is irregular and the nature of the micro world is unknowable, then he should stop to carry out research to seek the statistical operation law of the micro world. The law of statistics is also a law of operation. In addition, just because he did not know himself at that time, there was no need to make the claim that other people did not know, and it cannot be known by others in the future. Furthermore, if he thought only the oper...

Juniper Publishers-Social Sciences Abstract Whether the world works regularly or not, and whether the nature of the world is knowable or unknowable, Einstein and Bohr have debated these two questions for more than 40 years and even up to now, physicists continue the debate. From my point of view, this controversy was created by Bohr’s over claim. The purpose of this short note is to present my simple idea of unification of Einstein-Bohr controversy. Keywords: Einstein-Bohr controversy; Unification; Knowability; Agnosticism Opinion Whether the world works regularly or not, and whether the nature of the world is knowable or unknowable, Einstein and Bohr have debated these two questions for more than 40 years, no one was persuaded by the other until their death. After that, physicists divided into two camps to continue the debate. The detailed story can be found in many articles and books, e.g. [1,2]. I find Bohr’s agnosticism ...