Juniper Publishers-The Barrabas Legacy: Race and Racism in Trump’s America

Juniper Publishers- Open Access Journal of Social Sciences & Management studies





Opinion

On November 8, 2016, Donald Trump received 304 electoral votes to Hilary Clinton’s 227 votes. However, Clinton won both the popular vote and a higher percentage of victory than her opponent. Clinton received 65,794,399 (48.2%) of the vote to Trump’s 62,955,202 (46.1%) of the vote, a difference of nearly 2.9 million votes [1]. While this was not the first presidential candidate to lose an election by winning the popular vote, it was a loss by the largest popular margin of any candidate in an election. Further, this election outcome has been discussed, debated, reviewed, and rehashed extensively as to what occurred. This was an election that many pundits and pollsters had Clinton winning by a fairly significant margin. After all, her opponent had held no elective office, had no political experience, and Clinton was up against an individual who had winnowed his way to the Republican nomination. How does one explain the inexplicable?

In a recent meeting of ministers an explanation of the 2016 election was given by an elected official in a spiritual context. He said that following the election his pastor gave a sermon that compared the election to Jerusalem citizens asking for the release of Barrabas, an individual claimed to be a notorious prisoner in the Gospel of Matthew, over Jesus. In each of the four gospels it is revealed that a Passover custom in Jerusalem was to commute a prisoner’s death sentence by popular approval. When offered the choice of Barrabas or Jesus to be released, the crowd insisted that Pontius Pilate release Barrabas. That Barrabas moment, according to the pastor, was clearly an error in judgment, the crowd making the wrong choice. The results of the November 8, 2016 election demonstrated a Barrabas moment for many in America. Not for the first time had people chosen that which was not in their best interest. The consequences of that election have been especially impactful for race relations in the United States.

In Donald Trump’s America, racism has been validated at the highest level of government because he has endorsed it as President of the United States. His bigotry was not new and was prevalent throughout his life and at the foundation of his campaign for the presidency. “Trump moved racism from the euphemistic and plausibly deniable to the overt and freely claimed” [2]. Throughout his campaign Trump made racist and bigoted remarks that demonstrated his disdain for people of color. He called a judge biased because he was a “Mexican.” He refused to renounce white supremacist who campaigned for him. He called Mexican immigrants criminals and rapists. He lumped racial groups into monolithic minority collectives that he loves, like, “the Hispanics”, “the blacks,” “the Muslims” while denigrating the groups at the same time. He condoned the physical attack against an African American Black Lives Matter protester by his supporters, claiming that the man “should have been roughed up” [3].

Donald Trump’s racist America did not begin with his inauguration as the 45th President of the United States [4]. His public life has been obsessed with making racist remarks dating back to his time as a real estate developer in New York City. He was sued twice by the government for refusal by his real estate company to rent to African Americans in the 1970s. He treated his African American employees in his casinos with disdain, claiming that “laziness is a trait in blacks.” In 1989 he took out ads in New York newspapers calling for reinstatement of the death penalty and bringing back the police for five black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a wite woman in Central Park. He continued to claim they were guilty as late as October 2016 although DNA evidence had exonerated them [4]. He became the poster boy for birtherism, the racist conspiracy theory movement claiming that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya, not the United States. He also took out ads denigrating Native Americans, alleging that Mohawks had a well-documented record of criminal activity (Ibid).

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center [5], Donald Trump has opened the doors of the White House “to extremism, not only consulting with hate groups on policies that erode our country’s civil rights protections but enabling the infiltration of extremist ideas into the administration’s rhetoric and agenda” (SPLC, 2017). The radical right was previously on the fringes but found itself with a friend in the White House. Trump hired extremist advisors at the outset, such as Steve Bannon from Breitbart News as his chief strategist and Stephen Miller, an anti-Muslim extremist, as his senior advisor for policy (SPLC, 2017). The SPLC indicates that race incidents increased once Donald Trump became president. An atmosphere of intimidation and fear has been created as well as an environment that says overt racism is acceptable. Incidents have ranged from Nazi and racist graffiti being spray painted with references to Trump, middle school students shouting, “build the wall,” pro-Trump racist messages left at a church, to anti-semitic graffiti (Politti, 2016). Data from the Pew Research Center [6], indicate that most Americans believe that Trump’s election has led to worse race relations in the United States. Overall, 60% of Americans believe Trump’s election has caused race relations to become worse. Also, more of the public thinks that not enough attention is being paid to race and racial issues, with young adults more likely to believe this than older adults [6].

In Donald Trump’s America, there is every effort to change the narrative from issues of race and racism. He would declare that he is not racist, but evidence to the contrary demonstrates otherwise. Incidents such as those with Starbucks, the Waffle House, Roseanne Barr’s racist tweet, or the NFL players kneeling get deflected, either to something it is not, or to Trump himself. For example, the NFL players kneeling was about law enforcement mistreatment of African Americans and police brutality. That narrative was changed by Trump to respect for the flag and the national anthem and ultimately led to an NFL policy change about kneeling during the national anthem. The entire issue of police brutality against African Americans was dismissed with Trump ranting about players leaving the country and calling players “SOBs”. Mara Gay, editorial board member for the New York Times, states that Trump uses racism as a political tool simply to distract from the real issues [7].

The negative impact of the tax bill, the separation of families at the border, budget cuts in education, health and human service programs that are detrimental to millions of families are not part of American policy discussions. When the issue of Russian interference with the 2016 election and Trump collusion emerge, Trump changes the narrative, usually to a negative, blatant, generally false Twitter rant that plays to his alt-right base. Rather than making America great again, Donald Trump infuses the environment with a toxicity that serves as a reminder of the Barrabas legacy of making bad choices and having to live with those choices. While one may accept that racism in Trump’s America is a part of that legacy and American political life for the moment, future elections will give other choices and provide an opportunity for redemption.

For Read More... FullText click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/asm/ASM.MS.ID.555574.php
For More Open Access Journals In Juniper Publishers Please Click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/index.php

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advanced Technologies and Human Resource Management-Juniper Publishers

Image
A nnals of Social Sciences & Management Studies-Juniper Publishers Introduction For a time, human resource management was almost firmly an administrative function, with the professionals focusing their attention on completing repetitive tasks and serving as personal consultants to employees. Until 1970s most of the Personnel departments were considered as a place which hire people and keep personnel tracking. Through those records, the companies were able to get information on newly hired employees to the organization, fired, promoted and transferred while producing reports on present and to some extent on the past. There is no depreciation of importance and effect of the human resources management at all. Recently, management of human resources and its needs are becoming the center of the attention of each individual employer in every organization. The orientation of company on human resources starts to be one of the key tasks of a strategic management and human resources play an
Read more

Towards an Improved Bio-Resource Management System-Juniper Publishers

Image
   Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies-Juniper Publishers Opinion Bio-resource management is an issue that concerns sustainability of the global commons that humans depend on. This sustainability is sought to be ensured through reduction of environmental stressors that are generated through unplanned, unintended activities of humankind. Earth’s interlocked web of life is stressed through degradation in biotic (living environment including all organisms) and pollution in abiotic (physical environment like space, temperature, soil, air and precipitation) factors. These factors are involved in the production and consumption processes of energy and nutrient use in agriculture, industry and human services. Generally, there is a constant tussle between private and public use of bio-resources. There is difference of opinions over primacy of utilitarian economic imperatives of ‘wise-use’ of the environment by the agri-business and industrial sectors and the political-ethical imp
Read more

On Faith or Belief-Juniper Publishers

Image
   Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies-Juniper Publishers Introduction At the celebration of the 40th anniversary of China’s reform and opening in December 18, 2018, President Xi Jinping said, “Faith, conviction, and confidence are vital at all times. Small to one person, one collective, big to a political party, a nation, a country, as long as there is faith, conviction, confidence, it will become more and more courageous and brave, otherwise it will be defeated and self-destructed” [1]. But when I asked the graduate students who came to me for an interview the question what your faith or belief is, most people usually answered me that “I don’t have a faith”. Faith and conviction are the contents taught in the philosophy curriculum. From this phenomenon, at least two problems can be revealed. First, the philosophy taught at school and university was not accepted by them and did not become their faith or belief. Second, they might think that philosophy is useless, so the
Read more