Impact of Social Media on Public Health-Juniper Publishers
Juniper Publishers-Social Sciences
Abstract
As social media users increase and the user-generated
content grows, social media are playing an increasingly important role
in the general public’s life during the past decade. A group of the
users give their attention to health information on social media. They
are health professionals, health consumers, health stakeholders, and
health decision makers. The social media applications offer diversified
channels for open, convenient and effective health information seeking,
and enhance the communication between the health professionals and the
health consumers. The health professionals can know the health consumers
better and to generate different types of information for education and
training purposes on social media; the health consumers can choose the
most convenient and comfortable way to contact the health professionals;
the health organizations can monitor disease breakouts on social media.
The emergence of social media changes the health information seeking
behavior from unidirectional to bidirectional and extends the
traditional one-to-many information distribution mode to the
many-to-many mode. The negative impacts of social media on public health
include: (1) the quality of a part of the user-generated health
information on social media is low; (2) there is a risk of unintended
personal health information exposure when using social media..
Keywords: Social media; Public health; Health information; Health information seeking
Introduction
Social media are becoming increasingly important
during the past decade, since different social media applications
provide new communication channels for the general public. The
establishment of the Usenet and the Open Diary initiated the emergence
of social media. Compared with other Internet-based applications, social
media are unique in both technology and functionality: (1) social media
applications are founded on basis of the Web 2.0 technology; (2) social
media applications allow the general public to create content and
communicate spontaneously [1-2].
As the Internet technology keeps developing, new
social media applications with specific characteristics are emerging.
The big umbrella of social media currently covers a variety of
Internet-based applications, such as YouTube, Twitter, Instagram,
Wikipedia, and so forth. Some researchers have studied the nature,
characteristics, and functionalities of these applications. Kaplan and
Haenlein [1] proposed two dimensions of features for classifying the
applications: (1) “the degree of self-disclosure” and “the type of
self-presentation”; and (2) “the richness of the medium” and “the degree
of social presence” [1]. Xie and Stevenson classified the social media
applications into eight categories in terms of their functionalities
[2]. The eight categories were blogs, micro blogs, photo sharing sites,
pod casts, RSS feeds, social network sites, video sharing sites, and
Wikis.
The number of social media users and the use of
social media have grown rapidly. According to Social Media Usage:
2005-2015, American adults who used social network sites rose from 7% to
65% during 2005 to 2015 [3]. Smith and Anderson’s report illustrated
that American adults who used Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat,
LinkedIn, Twitter, and WhatsApp kept growing from 2015 to 2018 [4].
Among the large number of social media users, some
groups of users give special attention to the health-related information
and use these applications for health issues. They are health
professionals, health consumers, health stakeholders, and health
decision makers. The health-related information on social media covers a
wide range of topics, including diseases and treatments, nutrition,
health care and insurance, healthy lifestyle, and so forth. Furthermore,
social media allow users to develop their own health stories, interact
with each other, and search for health topics online. According to
Heidelberger’s survey, about 45% of the hospitals in Norway and Sweden
used LinkedIn and 22% of the hospitals in Norway used Facebook [5].
The purposes that health professionals use social
media include facilitating communication, increasing skills, and
increasing knowledge [6]. The information sources used by patients for
seeking health information are diverse but less authoritative
than those used by health professionals. Dawson reported that
Facebook was ranked the fourth health information source, and
YouTube and Twitter were also prevalent sources [7]. Additionally,
81% of European consumers and 63% of US consumers trust the
health information on social media applications [7]. These facts
reveal that social media are playing an important role in public
health.
Discussion
The growth of social media provides an open, convenient, and
effective way for health professionals, health consumers, health
stakeholders, and health decision makers to generate, share, and
seek health-related information, to communicate with each other,
and to build social connections. Compared with the traditional
online information systems, the information on social media is
open to the general public and easier for them to access, and most
of the user-generated content is free. It is helpful for the health
consumers, especially the poor, to gain general health knowledge.
In addition, every kind of social media has its unique features and
functions for solving specific problems. For instance, Wikipedia
aims to create knowledge collaboration, public social Q&A sites
are platforms for raising and solving questions, while social
network sites are mainly utilized for building and maintaining
social network. Therefore, selecting an appropriate social media
application can largely promote the efficiency and effectiveness
of health information seeking. However, a shortcoming is that the
users without enough knowledge of the social media applications
might easily get lost when utilizing the content on these
applications.
The diversified social media applications can fulfill the health
consumers’ information needs by offering different types of health
information (e.g. videos, audios, images and text) and information
seeking channels. The users can choose their favorite types of
information to read, which will improve the user experience, as
well as the effectiveness and efficiency of information seeking
and use. Regarding the information seeking channels, the health
consumers can not only seek information by the search functions
embedded in the applications or browsing, but also directly
contact the health professionals or patients who are users of
the applications and participate in group discussion to obtain
useful information. Furthermore, the health consumers can post
questions on social Q&A sites when they cannot acquire useful
information via the previous means, or when they want to hear
different voices. In this case, the health consumers are not only
information receivers, but also information senders.
From the health professionals’ perspective, the social media
applications enable them to know the health consumers better,
to educate and train them online, and to keep in touch with them
by different means. For instance, with the consumers’ consent,
the health professionals can review their Facebook posts and
tweets to know their health status and habits. For the education
and training purposes, the health professionals can post a series
of health-related lectures on video sharing sites (e.g. YouTube);
they can also share health knowledge by publishing articles on
their own blogs or Wikipedia. In addition to texts, phone calls,
emails and web portal communication, the health professionals
and consumers can contact each other by new means on social
media, such as online one-on-one chat, group discussion, channel
subscription (e.g. YouTube), and so on. Those various services
enable the two groups to choose the most convenient and
comfortable way for communication and interaction.
Like the health professionals, health organizations (e.g. the
World Health Organization) can educate and train the general
public on social media. The health organizations are also able
to organize and present popular health topics and monitor and
investigate disease breakouts based on the health information on
social media. Social media also have negative impacts on public
health. A serious problem is that the quality of the user-generated
content on social media varies. According to the previous studies,
the quality of the health information in online discussion forums
and Wikipedia is relatively high, while the user-generated content
on social network sites is not always credible [8]. The health
information of a low quality or the false health information might
hurt the health consumers.
The maintenance of professional standards on social media
is a challenge for doctors [9]. The professional standards require
the doctors to maintain patients’ confidentiality and maintain
clear doctor-patient boundaries. However, in the context of social
media, it is hard for the doctors to tell whether the friend requests
are sent by their patients or not. Neither can they avoid being
followed or contacted by their patients on social media. In this case,
the boundary between doctors and patients is vague. Moreover,
although a doctor can avoid mentioning her/his patients’ personal
information on social media, if s/he posts information related to
work, it is possible to identify the patients by analyzing the sum
of information posted. Therefore, more confidentiality protection
measures are needed in the social media context.
Conclusion
With the emergence of social media and the increase
of social
media users, the importance of social media in public health keeps
increasing. The new applications provide users with various types
of health information, change the health information seeking
behavior from unidirectional to bidirectional, and extend the
traditional one-to-many information distribution mode to the
many-to-many mode. In this way, the social media applications
build the open, convenient, efficient, and effective channels for
health information seeking and communication between the
health professionals and the health consumers. However, social
media have shortcomings as well: (1) the quality of a part of
the health information on social media is relatively low; (2) the
measures for protecting patients’ confidentiality on social media
are lacking. The two shortcomings will hurt the health consumers,the
health professionals, the health stakeholders, and the health
decision makers. More research is needed to overcome these two
shortcomings in the future.
For More Articles in Annals of Social Sciences & Management studies Please Click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/asm/index.php
Comments
Post a Comment